Are American Corporate Ceo’s Overpaid_ Essay

I believe that CEO’s are paid to much because it does not seem to matter just how well the company does while they are running it they still seem to make a ridiculous amount of money. This is wrong because they are supposed to be paid according to how well that the company does but even when it does poorly they are still paid exceedingly well. While this is not a surprise on top of being paid exceedingly well they are also given stock options which essentially increase there earnings even more. It used to be that the lowest paid employee in the company earned one tenth of the CEO. Now CEOs expect to earn at least 100 times as much as the lowest employee. The average pay of company CEO’s was almost 13 million in 2011. CEOs do not produce anything and, if their value were compensated by how well the company did under their leadership, they often would get pay cuts. If every company looks through their top leadership, pay difference is ridiculous.

It is the way it is because corporate America rules the country. If you have political connections and/or client connection and you can bring tons of new business then you can be CEO any day. Now if you start your own business – you can be CEO from day one (don’t require a special talent) just common business sense. Base salaries of corporate CEO’s should be on par with federal job grades just like for other employees. If they bring in all this money solely because of there new million dollar business and make profit out of it. They get a fix cut of it for that year. Paying CEO’s 100x, 300x, 500x more money then the rest is basically saying rest of the employees are suckers, looser and bottom feeders. Its a shame. CEO’s have become merely managers, or caretakers of their shareholders’ property. Yet they, inexplicably, are compensated as if they were visionaries. This is wrong. This is what the Occupy Wall Street crowd should be railing against.

Though, I can’t honestly say I have the skills needed to run a multi-million dollar organization as a CEO, let alone a major corporation like Apple, Oracle or Kraft Foods—but that doesn’t mean I believe that the collective group running America’s biggest companies are worth a $10.5 million pay raise as many organizations scratch and crawl their way out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. The spectacular collapse of banks whose executives were allegedly paid for performance clearly raises many questions about the link between executive pay and risk-taking. In 1980, bankers made no more than their counterparts in other parts of the economy, by 2000 wages in the financial sector were 40% higher for employees with the same formal qualifications The last time such a discrepancy was observed was just prior to the Great Depression—an irony which has not been lost on critics of bank compensation, ranging from regulators to the Occupy Wall Street protesters.

Read also  General Procedure for Transfer of Shares

But the level of compensation alone may not be the real problem. Many leading economists have emphasized that a much more important question to answer is how the structure of performance pay may encourage excessive risk-taking at all levels of the institution, from traders and underwriters right up to the firm’s CEO. By locking pay into contracts worth millions of dollars,CEO’s can then preside over a company’s risk-taking and inevitable bankruptcy while still getting paid. CEO’s can make a billion dollars a year, but they cant have a golden parachute clause or any kind of obligatory “bonus”. CEO’s supposedly deserve all this money for increasing shareholder value. But, executives are payed on stock performance which pushes them away from the real market—where customers are the focus and a leader’s job is to find better ways to serve them—to the expectations market, where the leader’s job is to manipulate Wall Street’s expectations about the company.

The only way an executive can raise the stock price is to make expectations rise from their current level. Eventually some executives decided, “We can do some sharp accounting, so it looks like we’re growing faster than we are, and we’ll do acquisitions that make it look like we’re growing like stink.” This new way of thinking has led to fraud and all kinds of scandals. Also, because expectations cannot rise forever, the CEO’s reaction to stock-based pay is to build expectations to a short-term peak, and then get the hell out before the company falls apart. This leads to job loss and economic hardships for the daily worker while the CEO makes millions of dollars.

In Conclusion, CEO’s are vastly overpaid. They make significantly more then the average employee for there company but, there getting payed big because of how expectations and the stock market work. CEO’s are inclined to push companies to get massive short term profits and then get out before the company fails. Meanwhile, they get paid large sums in bonuses and awards. Taking risk heavy actions and doing scandalous acts are not what the highest payed people in our country should be doing. That money would be better off going to someone or someones who have done a good job and contributed the most to the economy and society as a whole.

More Essays

  • Stock Dividend

    * Definition: * A corporate distribution to shareholders declared out of profits, at the discretion of the directors of the corporation, which is paid in the form of shares of stock, as opposed to money, and increases the number of shares. * A dividend paid as additional shares of stock rather than as...

  • Preferred Stock Versus Common Stock

    The primary advantage to an investor of holding preferred stock compared with common stock is that the preferred stock return is somewhat more predictable (more certain). The issuing company will generally make a real effort to try to avoid defaulting on the preferred stock dividend. Since the return to...

  • Corporation_ Weekly Reflection

    3.1 Differentiate types of stocks issued by corporations. The team concluded that the different types of stocks issued by a corporation are common stock, preferred stock, and treasury stock. Everyone is aware that common stock gives stockholders the right to vote on actions dealing with corporate earnings...

  • Ceo’s Role

    •Research the role Sharron Watkins played in the Enron Accounting Scandal. Sharron sent a memo and had a conversation with the CEO about potential accounting issues going on at Enron. In your opinion, did Sharron Watkins do everything she was morally required to do given her actions? For example of what I...

  • Stock Price

    1. If you bought a share of stock, what would you expect to receive, when would you expect to receive it, and would you be certain that your expectations would be met? 2. If most investors expect the same cash flows from Companies A and B but are more confident that Company A's cash flow will be close to...

  • Posthorn Corporation

    Posthorn Corporation acquired 20,000 of the 100,000 outstanding common shares of Stamp Company on January 1, 2010, for a cash consideration of $200,000 at a time when its shareholders' equity amounted to $1,000,000. The shares of both companies were traded on the national stock exchange. During 2010, Stamp...

  • The Stock Market Crash

    The 1920s was a time of peace and great prosperity in the United States. There was an increase of industrialization and there are new technologies such as radios and automobiles. The airflight was becoming widespread and because of these new innovations and technology, the economy benefited (Stock Market...

  • Fundamental Analysis of Banking Stocks

    The stock market is the most volatile market and is similar to the weather. Though this does not mean that the markets cannot be predicted but it only means that trends may change without warning, as with weather. The stockmarkets are characterized by almost all factors, again starting right from weather...

  • Preferred Stock

    Preferred stock is a security that, similar to debt, promises a well-defined (specified) but not necessarily constant contractual cash flow (dividend) to the holders of the security. Unlike debt, it does not cause the firm to be subject to bankruptcy if the dividends are not paid. The term preferred stock...

  • Evaluate the Case for and Against Buffer Stock Schemes

    A buffer stock scheme is an intervention carried out by the government which aims to limit fluctuations in the price of a commodity. It involves the government and/or local authorities buying these storage stocks and selling them back to the famer. Price stability is indicated by low inflation whereby the...

Read also  Stock Holdings Final